top of page
Search

Stop looking for "The Number." It doesn't exist.

  • Scott Hoffhines
  • Jan 14
  • 2 min read

"Market Rate" is a misleading term.


It implies there is a specific sticker price for talent. Like a gallon of milk. Leaders often think they can just look up "VP of Engineering" and find a single answer.


But in the real world, compensation data isn't a price tag. It is a scatter plot.


If you pull the raw data, you will see a massive range for the exact same job title. Why? Because the "market" is a messy mix of bootstrapped startups (paying in equity) and Big Tech giants (paying in cash).


If you average them all together, you get a number that is meaningless to everyone.


The Reality: You don't find your market rate. You choose it based on your stage.

Here is the "Stage-Based" cheat sheet to help you pick your lane:


  1. The Builders (Seed - Series A) Philosophy: High Upside The Target: Low Cash (25th %) | High Equity (75th %) The Why: You aren't hiring for safety; you are hiring missionaries who want the exit.

  2. The Scalers (Series B - C) Philosophy: Stability The Target: Balanced (50th % on Cash & Equity) The Why: You need to hire people with mortgages who can't take a pay cut, but still want skin in the game.

  3. The Giants (Late Stage / Public) Philosophy: Retention The Target: High Cash (75th %) | Steady Equity The Why: Your equity doesn't have 10x potential anymore, so you have to compete on salary.


The Bottom Line: If you are a Series A startup trying to compete with Netflix on base salary, you will burn out. If you are a Public company trying to pay Series A salaries, you will lose your talent.

Stop asking "What does the market pay?" Start asking "Where do we play?"


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
“Our job codes are a graveyard.”

It’s a classic sign that you’ve outgrown your initial approach. You look at your HRIS and see "Software Engineer III," "Senior Developer," and "Lead Coder" all doing the exact same work, but on three

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page